The basic message I got from at least 30 people was that they were a bit let down. Maybe it was because they went on late and ended early. Or that it was too packed, couldn't move without touching a few other people. The 'full set' by Tosca was about a half hour, then Richard played for about 2 hours, not living up to the publicity for that event. My friend working backstage said they couldn't get them on stage because they were too busy doing heroin, which I don't have a problem with people using as long as they are in control, but Richard was getting the scratch and nods around 2am and we knew it'd be over soon, people were clearing out when the bars stopped serving alcohol. The first hour was excellent, then it digressed into repetitive house and trance, all of which was him just playing his tracks with little mixing. The visuals were superb all the through, wrap around screen up front and flat screen behind with excellent projected graphics. It was way oversold, so why the short show?
-
Re: Tosca SF review
Thu, December 15, 2005 - 6:47 PMi recorded it and it allmost blows -
-
Re: Tosca SF review
Mon, December 19, 2005 - 11:19 AMI would like to hear that recording because i liked it. i thought that the layed down the break beats that we all wanted to get down to. -
-
-
Re: Tosca SF review
Mon, November 27, 2006 - 6:48 PMuhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...................................... totally not *THAT* bad. It was okay. It certainly did not "totally blow". At least I don't think it did. Huh.
-
-
-
Re: Tosca SF review
Wed, January 3, 2007 - 9:42 AMJeebus.... to say it blows... well... that is constructive.
But... it was fun. oversold, started late, ended early... welcome to the world of live music.
Damn spoiled brats.
Anyhoo... what you do is take the party to your loft and start spinning till dawn.
And Dawn is a hottie. She goes forever. Doesn't get tired at all.
hoot.
-
-
-
Re: Tosca SF review
Wed, September 13, 2006 - 2:47 AMblimey richard d on heroin. surley not!?